W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wsc-wg@w3.org > July 2007

Re: ISSUE-78: Definitions

From: Mary Ellen Zurko <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 18:09:04 -0400
To: Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFE90EDD46.93C38832-ON8525730C.00798261-8525730C.0079AE4E@LocalDomain>
If we need one, sure. If not, we can put it off until the rec track 
document. What are the terms in wsc-usecases that are used in multiple 
places that need definitions for readers/reviewers? As a reminder, here's 
our glossary, though it hasn't gotten much action beyond the great chrome 
debate: 
http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/Glossary






Web Security Context Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org> 
Sent by: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org
07/02/2007 07:35 AM
Please respond to
Web Security Context WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>


To
public-wsc-wg@w3.org
cc

Subject
ISSUE-78: Definitions








ISSUE-78: Definitions

http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/Group/track/issues/78

Raised by: Bruno von Niman
On product: Note: use cases etc.

Shouldn't we add definitions to the document?
Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 22:46:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 5 February 2008 03:52:48 GMT