- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 18:33:01 +0200
- To: michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com
- Cc: Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com, pbaker@verisign.com, tyler.close@hp.com, Bob.Pinheiro@FSTC.org, public-wsc-wg@w3.org
On 2007-04-02 09:31:05 -0500, michael.mccormick@wellsfargo.com wrote: > Unfortunately the new weekly meeting time conflicts with a > standing meeting related to my day job, which is why you haven't > had the pleasure of my company lately. > As it happens I do have some specific suggestions for improving > SSL/TLS cert handling in browsers, which I can share with the > group via email. I look forward to seeing these suggestions! Also, we have descriptions of the approaches that Konqueror, Opera and Mozilla take to handling these errors: - Opera: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Feb/0050.html - KDE: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/NoteKDECertificateValidationErrors - Mozilla: http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/wiki/%20NoteMozillaCertificateValidationErrors I wonder if we have any takers to review these and pull together the differences and commonalities in a way that might lead to a write-up? (I also have some proposed recommendations up my sleeve for these ones; then again Mozilla's certification information dialogue makes for such nice fodder for being trashed in talks that I'd almost hate to see it go away. *cough*) Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 2 April 2007 16:32:45 UTC