W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > July 2003

Burdett ML gap/fit analysis - first cut

From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:34:32 -0700
Message-ID: <3F26E868.9020106@tibco.com>
To: "'public-ws-chor@w3.org '" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

I made another pass over Burdett ML recently, and have some
comments about requirements it doesn't currently seem to meet.
I am sure there are things I missed, so consider this only a
possible starting point in the gap/fit analysis.

parallel execution - may be implicitly supported already; what if two
processes have same start state/end state? But may need explicit

decision points - currently, the only indication that a process is a
decision point is that it has >1 transition out of it. Should allow
specification of decision logic? This has been discussed previously -
could be a big issue.

Error vs. normal transitions - it is a requirement to support these.
Should a process have an implicit error transition to an error handler
(probably)? Raises issues of scope/nesting of error handling - cf. BPEL.

Composition - there is an extension mechanism and import - need other
kinds of composition support? Support for subprocesses is one missing
piece IMO.

IMO should simplify things so every state doesn't have to be named (I
have made a suggestion about this earlier - see
But this is not strictly a requirement.

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 17:34:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:00 UTC