Mark wrote: > Yes, this is generally regarded as a bug with URNs; that they don't > use the hierarchical capabilities of the generic URI syntax to denote > hierarchy. I personally don't think it's worth introducing a lot of > complexity to accomodate a broken and little-used (not to mention > non-dereferencable) URI scheme UDDI typically makes heavy use of the urn scheme. i'll leave whether UDDI is little used or not up to the reader. PaulReceived on Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:46:31 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:23 GMT