W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addr issues

From: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:52:20 -0000
Message-ID: <37E80E80B681A24B8F768D607373CA800172C724@largo.campus.ncl.ac.uk>
To: "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>, "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Hey Steve,

> While that's true, it doesn't help unless the contract 
> address is associated with the EPR such that having the EPR 
> can get you to the contract.

Yes you're right - I'll be more explicit: I think it's OK to not have
WSDL contract information embedded in an EPR  provided that the WSDL
contract can be obtained using the EPR (for example as part of a
WS-MetaDataExchange message exchange).

Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name 
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 21:52:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT