W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addr issues

From: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 14:38:34 -0800
To: Jim Webber <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Vinoski, Stephen" <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <20041103143834865.00000002360@amalhotr-pc>

My only concern is that WS-Metadata Exchange is a bit heavyweight.
How about a lightweight function that took the URI from the EPR as argument.

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim Webber
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:52 PM
To: Vinoski, Stephen; Doug Davis
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: RE: WS-Addr issues


Hey Steve,

> While that's true, it doesn't help unless the contract address is 
> associated with the EPR such that having the EPR can get you to the 
> contract.

Yes you're right - I'll be more explicit: I think it's OK to not have WSDL contract information embedded in an EPR  provided that the WSDL contract can be obtained using the EPR (for example as part of a WS-MetaDataExchange message exchange).

Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name 
Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 22:40:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:59 GMT