RE: WS-Addr issues

My only concern is that WS-Metadata Exchange is a bit heavyweight.
How about a lightweight function that took the URI from the EPR as argument.

All the best, Ashok

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jim Webber
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 1:52 PM
To: Vinoski, Stephen; Doug Davis
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: RE: WS-Addr issues


Hey Steve,

> While that's true, it doesn't help unless the contract address is 
> associated with the EPR such that having the EPR can get you to the 
> contract.

Yes you're right - I'll be more explicit: I think it's OK to not have WSDL contract information embedded in an EPR  provided that the WSDL contract can be obtained using the EPR (for example as part of a WS-MetaDataExchange message exchange).

Jim
--
http://jim.webber.name