W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2004

RE: WS-Addr issues

From: Vinoski, Stephen <Steve.Vinoski@iona.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:46:48 -0500
Message-ID: <13AC4E67178F4D4EA31BB1BA645303132DBCFB@amereast-ems2.boston.amer.iona.com>
To: "Jim Webber" <Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk>, "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

While that's true, it doesn't help unless the contract address is associated with the EPR such that having the EPR can get you to the contract.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Webber [mailto:Jim.Webber@newcastle.ac.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:25 PM
To: Vinoski, Stephen; Doug Davis
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Subject: RE: WS-Addr issues

> +1 to having a pointer to the WSDL itself in the EPR. We have 
> found in working with our customers that having access to the 
> service definition is critical for applications that rely on 
> pure dynamic dispatching.

-1 :-)

But there's nothing to stop a WSDL contract from being addressable.

Received on Wednesday, 3 November 2004 21:47:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:06 UTC