W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2013

Re: [whatwg] seamless iframes and event propagation

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:14:51 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78hYE4OMeGDMxFDPybT5M5qT8tcyOgXUVwK45tnFZJ4vhQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Eric Seidel <eric@webkit.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org> wrote:
>>> Okay, so event path would be (in tree order):
>>>
>>> <a> -- [shadow root] -> .. -> <insertion point> -- <b> -- [shadow
>>> root] -> .. -> <c>
>>>
>>> In this case, the adjustment happens twice, at <b> and <a>.
>>
>> Normally with <b> being a child of <a> there would not be any
>> adjustment.
>
> Yup. I don't understand whether you're just agreeing with me or disagreeing :)
>
> With shadow trees in place, we need to let them react to events
> happening in nodes, distributed to insertion points.

Is there any adjustment if offset* are computed on getting anyway?
(Calling it adjustment if there's no actual adjustment (they're just
relative to target) seems wrong.)


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 19:15:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:12 GMT