W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > January 2013

Re: [whatwg] seamless iframes and event propagation

From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:17:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CADh5Ky2WAao5Qcz0gbc9ZZH67pQH8qf4v14Y3b5Rb7fi5KQiMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Eric Seidel <eric@webkit.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

>>> Normally with <b> being a child of <a> there would not be any
>>> adjustment.
>>
>> Yup. I don't understand whether you're just agreeing with me or disagreeing :)
>>
>> With shadow trees in place, we need to let them react to events
>> happening in nodes, distributed to insertion points.
>
> Is there any adjustment if offset* are computed on getting anyway?
> (Calling it adjustment if there's no actual adjustment (they're just
> relative to target) seems wrong.)

Whoops, sorry -- don't understand if we're talking about adjust
target/relativeTarget or offset* in the example. If the former, then
yes, it's really not any sort of adjustment. Just grab the current
value of target and compute on demand.

:DG<
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 19:18:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 18:48:12 GMT