- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:17:56 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Eric Seidel <eric@webkit.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >>> Normally with <b> being a child of <a> there would not be any >>> adjustment. >> >> Yup. I don't understand whether you're just agreeing with me or disagreeing :) >> >> With shadow trees in place, we need to let them react to events >> happening in nodes, distributed to insertion points. > > Is there any adjustment if offset* are computed on getting anyway? > (Calling it adjustment if there's no actual adjustment (they're just > relative to target) seems wrong.) Whoops, sorry -- don't understand if we're talking about adjust target/relativeTarget or offset* in the example. If the former, then yes, it's really not any sort of adjustment. Just grab the current value of target and compute on demand. :DG<
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 19:18:22 UTC