- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 15:10:45 +0200
- To: "Weidenbrueck, Dieter" <dweidenbrueck@ptc.com>
- Cc: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>, "WebCGM WG" <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
On Tuesday, September 11, 2007, 3:10:01 PM, Dieter wrote: WD> Lofton, WD> E02 and E03 look good to me. WD> One question: WD> <OBJECT DATA="xxx.cgm" TYPE="image/cgm;Version=4;ProfileId=WebCGM" WD> WIDTH="200" HEIGHT="100" > WD> This is the correct way to specify an OBJECT. What happens in the case WD> of a cascading profile? The fact that a profile is cascading is opaque here. It makes for a smaller and clearer definition of the profile, but does not change what the name of the profile is. WD> The ProfileID=WebCGM would be wrong for an ATA or S1000D profile. Yes. WD> Do we actually need the profile ID here? Yes - the MIMER registration says this parameter is required, not optional. WD> This is probably confusing WD> anyway, because the integrator has no clue as to which files he will WD> display in the viewer at the time he has to write this. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 13:11:30 UTC