On Monday, September 10, 2007, 5:51:47 PM, Lofton wrote: LH> To summarize the below-linked minutes, our recommended strategy is to get LH> 4-week W3C/public review and publish the approved 1.0 errata document, but LH> to skip the hassle of republishing an entire new WebCGM 1.0 Third Release LH> document (Edited Recommendation). >Today's minutes: >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Minutes/2007/08/30-webcgm-minutes.html I heard that the 'approved errata' option was being removed due to not being used. i have copied Ian Jacobs for an authoritative statement on whether that can still be used or not. Ian, this is a publicly archived list. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CGReceived on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 13:20:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:19:10 GMT