I've made this change as Björn suggested: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/rev/289e147479bc Thanks! -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Developer Advocate Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Hill, Brad wrote: > >Perhaps "if the URL does not contain an authority component" is the > >correct language, from http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.1 ? > > That says something about instances, while the intent is to talk about > classes; for example, `javascript://example.com/` contains an authority > component, even though the 'javascript' scheme does not use registered > names in its syntax. If you want a stable reference for this, you could > say "If the Origin of the URI is (defined to be) a globally unique > identifier ..." with reference to RFC 6454, section 4. > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ >
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 10:27:58 UTC