On Tue, 08 May 2007 11:49:17 +0200, Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: > I don't see why HTTP is mandatory either, to be honest, although I accept > that that's what most scripts will use it for. The problem is that things are not very well defined for non-HTTP thingies at the moment. If at some point we get a more protocol neutral version of the specification I think it would make sense to reconsider this particular statement within the conformance criteria, yes. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:20:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT