- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:19:30 +0200
- To: "Stewart Brodie" <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>, public-webapi@w3.org
On Tue, 08 May 2007 11:49:17 +0200, Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: > I don't see why HTTP is mandatory either, to be honest, although I accept > that that's what most scripts will use it for. The problem is that things are not very well defined for non-HTTP thingies at the moment. If at some point we get a more protocol neutral version of the specification I think it would make sense to reconsider this particular statement within the conformance criteria, yes. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:20:13 UTC