W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2007

Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments

From: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 10:49:17 +0100
To: public-webapi@w3.org
Message-ID: <5321ab1063813e8c844a563310431a0980a5f514@localhost>

Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> On Tuesday, May 8, 2007, 12:11:38 AM, Innovimax wrote:
> 
> IS> I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that
> IS> does not support XML at all !!
> 
> I agree that an XHR with no XML support does not make sense. Which
> means XML must be supported. On the other hand, that does not mean
> that XML is the only content that can be transported with it.

I do not agree that it does not make sense - this is a generic mechanism for
accessing URIs.  Requiring simple textual data to be transmitted and
received as XML would be a huge burden on embedded clients, for example.

I don't see why HTTP is mandatory either, to be honest, although I accept
that that's what most scripts will use it for.


-- 
Stewart Brodie
Software Engineer
ANT Software Limited
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 09:48:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT