On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote: >> I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does not >> support XML at all !! > > I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may > still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there > should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if > the baseline conforming implementation doesn't. That makes sense. I added a "conforming XML user agent" class. I hope this satisfies the people who replied in this thread (all in To:). (I'm treating the comment from Stewart Brodie as a separate comment.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:11:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT