W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapi@w3.org > May 2007

Re: The XMLHttpRequest Object comments

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 12:10:55 +0200
To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>, "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>, "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Web API WG (public)" <public-webapi@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.trz6kho664w2qv@id-c0020.oslo.opera.com>

On Tue, 08 May 2007 01:16:57 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  
wrote:
> On May 7, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Innovimax SARL wrote:
>> I agree that it seems strange to have an "XML"HttpRequest that does not  
>> support XML at all !!
>
> I don't necessarily agree with that, I can see that non-XML UAs may  
> still want to support it only for transmitting text. But I think there  
> should be a conformance class that does include the XML support, even if  
> the baseline conforming implementation doesn't.

That makes sense. I added a "conforming XML user agent" class. I hope this  
satisfies the people who replied in this thread (all in To:).


(I'm treating the comment from Stewart Brodie as a separate comment.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2007 10:11:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:57 GMT