Le 06-04-22 à 17:29, Anne van Kesteren a écrit : > On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 08:45:50 +0200, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: >> [...] >> >> I may be wrong but it seems the first part of the story is missing >> in the introduction as in it seems that the API has been >> originally developed by Microsoft as it is mentionned[1] in many >> places. I'm not sure it will be seen positively if we omit this in >> the document. I would then add a mention about this too along WHAT >> WG work. >> >> [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMLHttpRequest#History_and_support > > Microsoft is now mentioned in the acknowledgements section. WHATWG > work should probably be moved to the history section (if we need > one) as the introduction should be, imho, about functionality in > the specification. Agreed, introduction should only refer to the technology in terms of functionality. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 05:16:23 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:55 GMT