W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Accessibility Tests For Stanca Act

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:10:33 +0200
Message-ID: <442BA089.4010805@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Christophe Strobbe wrote:

> At 16:29 29/03/2006, Jon Ribbens wrote:
> 
>> Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> wrote:
>> > One of the things I found surprising is the requirement for web
>> > sites to validate as 'strict'.
>>
>> It's not that surprising, it's effectively also a requirement for
>> WCAG 1.0 "AA" compliance (checkpoints 3.2 and 11.2).
> 
> 
> Hmm. I don't see the word "strict" in those success criteria.
> For conformance to WCAG 1.0 you can still use the transitional DTDs
> and avoid their deprecated features.

Well, yes. But why do you reference a transitional document type when 
you use only markup from the strict one?

-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:10:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT