W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2006

Re: Accessibility Tests For Stanca Act

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:08:31 +0200
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20060330110524.031e6208@mailserv.esat.kuleuven.be>
To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

At 16:29 29/03/2006, Jon Ribbens wrote:

>Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> wrote:
> > One of the things I found surprising is the requirement for web
> > sites to validate as 'strict'.
>
>It's not that surprising, it's effectively also a requirement for
>WCAG 1.0 "AA" compliance (checkpoints 3.2 and 11.2).

Hmm. I don't see the word "strict" in those success criteria.
For conformance to WCAG 1.0 you can still use the transitional DTDs
and avoid their deprecated features.
Is that also what the Stanca Act allows, or does it only allow the
Strict DTD?

Regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 09:07:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT