Re: Against test 9 (d-links)

Then, I think this is your expression:

//img[@longdesc][let $fs := following-sibling::* return
$fs = () or node-name($fs) != "a" or $fs/text() != "[D]" or 
not($fs/@title)]

It means that, given a link with a longdesc attribute, its following 
sibling should be a d-link (and it should have a mandatory title).

Anyway, I still don't support it :-), because the following-sibling 
relationship is a very weak relationship.

Cheers.

Vicente Luque Centeno
Dep. Ingeniería Telemática
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
http://www.it.uc3m.es/vlc

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Charles McCN wrote:

> On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:14:11 +0200, Vicente Luque Centeno <vlc@it.uc3m.es> 
> wrote:
>
>> So, I think it should be deprecated.
>> Comments?
>
> That's for the WCAG group to decide. As far a I can tell our part of the job 
> is to tell WCAG whenever we can make reliable tests - if you don't like the 
> thing that we are testing then you hav to argue for/against in the WCAG 
> group.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>