W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-uwa@w3.org > December 2007

Re: Including location, calendar and contact data in the ontology

From: José Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:19:24 +0100
To: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
Cc: public-uwa@w3.org
Message-id: <475FD1CC.8090002@tid.es>

According to [1] they have extended the W3C's Geo2003 vocabulary to 
include not only points but other geometric shapes that can represent 
where something is

It think we need to liaise with this people, in order to progress that 
kind of ontology as something recommended by the W3C What do you think?

Best Regards

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/#owl

Dave Raggett escribió:
> Thanks for the pointers. A quick glance at their ontology suggests 
> that it focuses on spatial relationships rather than locations, and as 
> such would complement our work on basic location data, see
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uwa/2007Nov/0004.html
>  Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Regarding location, it could be worth having a look at the reports 
>> [1] [2] produced by the Geospatial Incubator Group that recently 
>> ended. Also, it could be worth knowing more about the plans of the 
>> people involved in that group with respect to continuing the work
>> Best Regards
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont/
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 12:25:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:47:23 UTC