I completely agree with the need to liaise with them, The XG has closed, but we should be able to find a to contact them. Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote: > According to [1] they have extended the W3C's Geo2003 vocabulary > to include not only points but other geometric shapes that can > represent where something is > > It think we need to liaise with this people, in order to progress > that kind of ontology as something recommended by the W3C What do > you think? > > Best Regards > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/#owl > > Dave Raggett escribió: >> Thanks for the pointers. A quick glance at their ontology suggests that it >> focuses on spatial relationships rather than locations, and as such would >> complement our work on basic location data, see >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-uwa/2007Nov/0004.html >> >> >> Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett >> >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, José Manuel Cantera Fonseca wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Regarding location, it could be worth having a look at the reports [1] [2] >>> produced by the Geospatial Incubator Group that recently ended. Also, it >>> could be worth knowing more about the plans of the people involved in that >>> group with respect to continuing the work >>> >>> Best Regards >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo/ >>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/XGR-geo-ont/ > > > >Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 14:22:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:37:21 GMT