W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-test-infra@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Priorities for Test Asset Development

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 11:16:24 +0000
Message-ID: <51138D08.6040605@w3.org>
To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
CC: "public-test-infra@w3.org" <public-test-infra@w3.org>
Hi Bryan,

Sorry for the delayed response.  I tend to develop test to the timetable 
of the i18n WG needs, since we use the tests for formulating advice and 
outreach materials in particular. It's a lot of effort, however, so I'm 
keen to transfer whatever tests we develop to the HTML and CSS (and any 
other) test suites to avoid duplication and waste.

There isn't a formal process in place for that.

In the past i supplied copies of some tests to Fantasai, who then took 
charge of integrating into the CSS test suite.  We may well have updated 
some of those tests since, btw.

I also supplied some tests to PLH a while back for the HTML5 test suite, 
but I don't think that got far, since the test framework was still in devt.

Aharon Lanin has been providing tests for the new bidi features in HTML5 
directly to the HTML5 test suite and in parallel to the i18n test suite.

So that's a quick potted history. Upshot, there is no standard process 
in place for merging or mapping i18n tests into other tests at the 
moment, but i think it would be good to have one.

hth,
RI



On 01/02/2013 00:52, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> Thanks for the input, Richard. I was unsure if the i18n tests were testing those features in the context/permutations of internationalization scenarios, or whether they were tests of the basic functionality of the features as defined by the CSS specs. I was assuming (bad, I know) that CSS features would first be validated through tests of the CSSWG for the specs, so I looked there first.
>
> Is there a mapping between the i18n tests and the corresponding tests shown in http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/? For example, I see 646 tests in http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-text/results but there are only 2 approved tests for CSS Text in http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/.
>
> Bryan Sullivan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:12 AM
> To: public-test-infra@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Priorities for Test Asset Development
>
> Please consider using i18n tests where appropriate. For example...
>
> On 30/01/2013 00:48, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
>> 1) specs with no tests (found so far...)
>>
>> -              ... CSS Fonts, CSS Text Module Level 3,
>
> http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-text/results
>
> http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-fonts/results
>
> There are also i18n tests for other CSS3 modules:
>
> http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css-writing-modes/results
>
> http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-lists/results
> (actually counter styles, rather than lists)
>
> There are also CSS 2.1 tests at
>
> http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css21/results
>
>
>
> Fwiw, you can find i18n  tests (and recent results) summarised at
> http://www.w3.org/International/tests/
>
>
> RI
>
>
>


-- 
Richard Ishida
W3C
http://rishida.net/
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 11:16:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 February 2013 11:16:55 GMT