RE: Priorities for Test Asset Development

Thanks for the input, Richard. I was unsure if the i18n tests were testing those features in the context/permutations of internationalization scenarios, or whether they were tests of the basic functionality of the features as defined by the CSS specs. I was assuming (bad, I know) that CSS features would first be validated through tests of the CSSWG for the specs, so I looked there first.

Is there a mapping between the i18n tests and the corresponding tests shown in http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/? For example, I see 646 tests in http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-text/results but there are only 2 approved tests for CSS Text in http://test.csswg.org/shepherd/. 

Bryan Sullivan 

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:12 AM
To: public-test-infra@w3.org
Subject: Re: Priorities for Test Asset Development

Please consider using i18n tests where appropriate. For example...

On 30/01/2013 00:48, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L wrote:
> 1) specs with no tests (found so far...)
>
> -              ... CSS Fonts, CSS Text Module Level 3,

http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-text/results

http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-fonts/results


There are also i18n tests for other CSS3 modules:

http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css-writing-modes/results


http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css3-lists/results 
(actually counter styles, rather than lists)

There are also CSS 2.1 tests at

http://w3c-test.org/framework/app/suite/i18n-css21/results




Fwiw, you can find i18n  tests (and recent results) summarised at 
http://www.w3.org/International/tests/



RI



-- 
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Activity Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/

http://rishida.net/

Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 00:53:59 UTC