W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > February 2006

RE: Race condition for WSDL RDF mapping?

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:05:24 -0500
Message-ID: <A5EEF5A4F0F0FD4DBA33093A0B075590097B6830@tayexc18.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>, <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

I think what they most need is evidence that somebody will actually
*use* the mapping that they are producing.  

David Booth


> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of 
> ewallace@cme.nist.gov
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 2:31 PM
> To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Race condition for WSDL RDF mapping?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> With respect to the WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping: 
> 
> Last month an email [1] was sent out to the SWS list calling 
> for reviews of the RDF mapping for WSDL.  In this email, it 
> was mentioned that so few comments on this have been received 
> that they are considering dropping this from the WSDL 2 spec. 
>  This is interesting given comments in our group that the 
> reviewers were looking (waiting) for a more complete mapping 
> before sending substantial comments.  It would be a shame for 
> this mapping to go away because of a publication process 
> deadlock.  Perhaps one of the reviewers within SWBPD could 
> send these people [2] an email explaining that its lack of 
> completeness has resulted in lack of feedbank.?
> 
> -Evan
> 
> [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2006Jan/0031.html
> [2] public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 22:05:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:09:46 UTC