With respect to the WSDL 2.0 RDF Mapping: Last month an email [1] was sent out to the SWS list calling for reviews of the RDF mapping for WSDL. In this email, it was mentioned that so few comments on this have been received that they are considering dropping this from the WSDL 2 spec. This is interesting given comments in our group that the reviewers were looking (waiting) for a more complete mapping before sending substantial comments. It would be a shame for this mapping to go away because of a publication process deadlock. Perhaps one of the reviewers within SWBPD could send these people [2] an email explaining that its lack of completeness has resulted in lack of feedbank.? -Evan [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sws-ig/2006Jan/0031.html [2] public-ws-desc-comments@w3.orgReceived on Monday, 6 February 2006 19:30:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:17:20 GMT