Re: incomplete meeting records regarding rdftm-survey document transition

Ralph R. Swick wrote:
> Guus, David;
> 
> I am working on the transition request for RDFTM-Survey to Working Group
> Note and am having difficulty locating the Working Group resolution confirming
> this transition.

I was unable to attend, but I understood the decision has been made. So, 
we should repair the minutes. I will add a proposal for this on the 
agenda for Jan 9.

Guus

> 
> The agenda request was confirmed via Valentina's mail [1]
> 
>   [1]
>   Re: [RDFTM, All] Note proposal - rdftm survey
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0101.html
>   Valentina, 2005-11-17
> 
> but the meeting record [2] of the subsequent teleconference (for which
> I'd noted regrets due to a staff meeting conflict) does not include
> discussion or a resolution to request the document transition.
> 
>    [2]
>    http://www.w3.org/2005/11/28-swbp-minutes.html
>    Record of 2005-11-28 Telecon
> 
> (which, as of the 14-December 18:17:23 version, is identical to the
> attachment in David Booth's message of 12 December [3].)
> 
>    [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Dec/0053.html
> 
> However, the subsequent meeting on 12 December [4] says
> that the decision was taken.
> 
>    [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/12/12-swbp-irc#T19-20-02
> 
> Is the record of the 28 November meeting incomplete or was
> this agendum overlooked?
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 598 7739/7718; e-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/

Received on Saturday, 31 December 2005 15:28:10 UTC