Re: SPARQL semantics: open issue bnodeRef

On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 17:04 +0100, Enrico Franconi wrote:
> >   http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#bnodeRef
> >
> > We'll need new information in order to re-open bnodeRef
> > and consider designs.
> 
> Aren't you happy of the lengthy discussion in the SWBP WG I was  
> mentioning?


I don't see that it provides any information that the DAWG
didn't consider in making its decision on bnodeRef, no.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 19:57:54 UTC