W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Agenda, 27 June 2013 SVG WG telcon

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:44:12 +0200
To: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wzadmlrhgeuyw5@gnorps>
Hello everyone,
the agenda for this week's call is below.

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06&day=27&year=2013&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
Phone: +1 617-761-6200 (US) or
           zakim@voip.w3.org (SIP)
Conference code: SVG1# (7841#)
IRC for minutes/discussion: #svg on irc.w3.org, port 6665
Agenda requests: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Agenda


* Questions concerning multiple paints, see  
https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/painting.html
   - Should the document be in error if a non-final paint-server reference  
is invalid? (Only the last paint-server has a fallback.)
   - How should 'child' behave with allowing multiple paints?

* Should text-overflow apply to text-on-path?

* SVG2 Text wrapping - new definition of 'width'?
   SVG 2 has already added 'width' to <text> for use with text-overflow  
(but 'height' has not been added). In Doug's wrapping-context proposal,  
'width' defines a retangular wrapping context for horizontal text while  
'height' defines a rectangular wrapping context for vertical text.  
text-overflow only applies if both a 'width' and 'height' are specified.  
Can we agree to this new definition of 'width'?


-- 
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 12:44:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 26 June 2013 12:44:53 UTC