W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Agenda+ SVG to ISO

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:05:44 -0400
Message-ID: <51CAF538.9040209@w3.org>
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, folks-

Last time we talked about this, it apparently wasn't minuted properly, 
and I'm not sure we have consensus.

Regards-
-Doug

On 6/26/13 8:44 AM, Erik Dahlstrom wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> the agenda for this week's call is below.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06&day=27&year=2013&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0
>
> Phone: +1 617-761-6200 (US) or
>            zakim@voip.w3.org (SIP)
> Conference code: SVG1# (7841#)
> IRC for minutes/discussion: #svg on irc.w3.org, port 6665
> Agenda requests: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Agenda
>
>
> * Questions concerning multiple paints, see
> https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/painting.html
>    - Should the document be in error if a non-final paint-server
> reference is invalid? (Only the last paint-server has a fallback.)
>    - How should 'child' behave with allowing multiple paints?
>
> * Should text-overflow apply to text-on-path?
>
> * SVG2 Text wrapping - new definition of 'width'?
>    SVG 2 has already added 'width' to <text> for use with text-overflow
> (but 'height' has not been added). In Doug's wrapping-context proposal,
> 'width' defines a retangular wrapping context for horizontal text while
> 'height' defines a rectangular wrapping context for vertical text.
> text-overflow only applies if both a 'width' and 'height' are specified.
> Can we agree to this new definition of 'width'?
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 14:05:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 26 June 2013 14:05:51 UTC