W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2013

Re: Agenda, 27 June 2013 SVG WG telcon

From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:59:58 +0200
Message-ID: <51CAE5CE.1050505@telecom-paristech.fr>
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Regrets for me this week.

Cyril

Le 26/06/2013 14:44, Erik Dahlstrom a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
> the agenda for this week's call is below.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06&day=27&year=2013&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 
>
> Phone: +1 617-761-6200 (US) or
>           zakim@voip.w3.org (SIP)
> Conference code: SVG1# (7841#)
> IRC for minutes/discussion: #svg on irc.w3.org, port 6665
> Agenda requests: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Agenda
>
>
> * Questions concerning multiple paints, see 
> https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/painting.html
>   - Should the document be in error if a non-final paint-server 
> reference is invalid? (Only the last paint-server has a fallback.)
>   - How should 'child' behave with allowing multiple paints?
>
> * Should text-overflow apply to text-on-path?
>
> * SVG2 Text wrapping - new definition of 'width'?
>   SVG 2 has already added 'width' to <text> for use with text-overflow 
> (but 'height' has not been added). In Doug's wrapping-context 
> proposal, 'width' defines a retangular wrapping context for horizontal 
> text while 'height' defines a rectangular wrapping context for 
> vertical text. text-overflow only applies if both a 'width' and 
> 'height' are specified. Can we agree to this new definition of 'width'?
>
>


-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.wp.mines-telecom.fr/
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 13:00:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 26 June 2013 13:00:10 UTC