- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:59:58 +0200
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Regrets for me this week. Cyril Le 26/06/2013 14:44, Erik Dahlstrom a écrit : > Hello everyone, > the agenda for this week's call is below. > > http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06&day=27&year=2013&hour=20&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 > > Phone: +1 617-761-6200 (US) or > zakim@voip.w3.org (SIP) > Conference code: SVG1# (7841#) > IRC for minutes/discussion: #svg on irc.w3.org, port 6665 > Agenda requests: http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/Agenda > > > * Questions concerning multiple paints, see > https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/painting.html > - Should the document be in error if a non-final paint-server > reference is invalid? (Only the last paint-server has a fallback.) > - How should 'child' behave with allowing multiple paints? > > * Should text-overflow apply to text-on-path? > > * SVG2 Text wrapping - new definition of 'width'? > SVG 2 has already added 'width' to <text> for use with text-overflow > (but 'height' has not been added). In Doug's wrapping-context > proposal, 'width' defines a retangular wrapping context for horizontal > text while 'height' defines a rectangular wrapping context for > vertical text. text-overflow only applies if both a 'width' and > 'height' are specified. Can we agree to this new definition of 'width'? > > -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Telecom ParisTech 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://concolato.wp.mines-telecom.fr/
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 13:00:10 UTC