W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Updated Summary of Discussions about FX work items

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:06:08 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinD0eADrCg-p+jobAEZDFRPT8eKsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote:
> I think the shared properties resolution should be reworded slightly. It
> would be nice if the CSS WG coordinated when adding properties that could be
> useful for svg too. I'd drop "random" from the resolution. Any change to an
> existing shared property will need coordination between the groups, any new
> shared properties can probably be handled in an SVG spec if it affects svg -
> or directly in a CSS spec if that's deemed more appropriate when
> coordinating.

Any ideas on how to determine when a CSS property may be useful for
SVG?  I believe there are some easy guidelines (anything to do with
layout isn't useful for SVG), but, for example, how much of the Image
Values spec is useful?

Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 17:08:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:20:13 UTC