W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Updated Summary of Discussions about FX work items

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:06:08 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinD0eADrCg-p+jobAEZDFRPT8eKsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote:
> I think the shared properties resolution should be reworded slightly. It
> would be nice if the CSS WG coordinated when adding properties that could be
> useful for svg too. I'd drop "random" from the resolution. Any change to an
> existing shared property will need coordination between the groups, any new
> shared properties can probably be handled in an SVG spec if it affects svg -
> or directly in a CSS spec if that's deemed more appropriate when
> coordinating.

Any ideas on how to determine when a CSS property may be useful for
SVG?  I believe there are some easy guidelines (anything to do with
layout isn't useful for SVG), but, for example, how much of the Image
Values spec is useful?

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 17:08:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 June 2011 17:08:20 GMT