W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Updated Summary of Discussions about FX work items

From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:17:06 -0700
To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA308FE4.A649%vhardy@adobe.com>
Thanks for the feedback Erik. Here is an updated version with your comments.

Vincent

From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com<mailto:ed@opera.com>>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 02:03:52 -0700
To: "public-svg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-svg-wg@w3.org>" <public-svg-wg@w3.org<mailto:public-svg-wg@w3.org>>
Subject: Re: Updated Summary of Discussions about FX work items

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:12:24 +0200, Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com<mailto:vhardy@adobe.com>> wrote:

Hello,

I have updated the list of work items with the results from our recent
discussions. I think there are still a few things to work out:

- formal resolutions on transforms and animations.
- discussion about advanced text layout and resolution.

Kind regards,
Vincent

I think the shared properties resolution should be reworded slightly. It
would be nice if the CSS WG coordinated when adding properties that could
be useful for svg too. I'd drop "random" from the resolution. Any change
to an existing shared property will need coordination between the groups,
any new shared properties can probably be handled in an SVG spec if it
affects svg - or directly in a CSS spec if that's deemed more appropriate
when coordinating.

--
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed





Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 15:17:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 June 2011 15:17:55 GMT