- From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:41:39 +0100
- To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9C54EB89.80B82097-ON802574D7.003EB990-802574D7.004040C9@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings, our next call will take place on Tuesday 2008-10-07 at 16:00UTC
and last for 1 hour.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2008&month=10&day=07&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136&p2=179&p3=283
We will be using the Zakim bridge [1], the phone numbers and passcode for
the call can be found at:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin
Participants are invited to join IRC channel #soap-jms as documented on
the WG's administrative home page:
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin#irc
Minutes of last call : http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-soap-jms-minutes.html
Oustanding Actions
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open
Agenda
Regrets: none
Review all open actions
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TextMessage - how do we support it?
- Phil's proposed changes to spec
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0035.html
This topic has been ongoing for a while and was agreed by those on the
2008-09-30 call. If there any concerns please send them to the mailing
before this call so that they can be reviewed and allowing us to close
off this topic.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Is WSDL portion of specification normative, continued? [2]
- whatever the collective decision,
text needs to be improved for clarity of our intent
[2] - Email from Roland of 2008-09-25:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0039.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0043.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
URI spec, what changes do we want?
- Action35 [3] Eric proposal [4]
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/35
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0046.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Specifying additional JNDI parameters, [5] & [6]
- Should these JNDI items go into the URI? [7]
- Do we need to worry about non-String JNDI values? Answer - don't think
so.
[5] - Email from Derek of 2008-09-22
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0028.html
[6] - Email from Eric of 2008-09-22
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0031.html
[7] - Email from Peter of 2008-09-22
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0026.html
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
JMS headers, do we want to allow for setting arbitrary headers? [8]
[8] - Email from Peter of 2008-09-25
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0041.html
Pubs
SOAP over Java? Message Service 1.0
Editor Draft
[
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8
]
First Public Working Draft published
[ http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20080723/ ]
Next draft: Last Call, milestone plan in Charter says Sept 2008
Regards, Roland
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 11:42:24 UTC