W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-soap-jms@w3.org > October 2008

Agenda for 2008-10-07

From: Roland Merrick <roland_merrick@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 12:41:39 +0100
To: public-soap-jms@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF9C54EB89.80B82097-ON802574D7.003EB990-802574D7.004040C9@uk.ibm.com>
Greetings, our next call will take place on Tuesday 2008-10-07 at 16:00UTC 
and last for 1 hour. 
  
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2008&month=10&day=07&hour=16&min=0&sec=0&p1=136&p2=179&p3=283 


We will be using the Zakim bridge [1], the phone numbers and passcode for 
the call can be found at: 
 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin 

Participants are invited to join IRC channel #soap-jms as documented on 
the WG's administrative home page: 
 http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/admin#irc 

Minutes of last call :  http://www.w3.org/2008/09/30-soap-jms-minutes.html 


Oustanding Actions 
        http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/open 
Agenda 
Regrets: none 

Review all open actions 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TextMessage - how do we support it? 
  - Phil's proposed changes to spec
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0035.html
This topic has been ongoing for a while and was agreed by those on the 
2008-09-30 call. If there any concerns please send them to the mailing 
before this call so that they can be reviewed and allowing us to close 
off this topic.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Is WSDL portion of specification normative, continued? [2]
 - whatever the collective decision, 
   text needs to be improved for clarity of our intent

[2] - Email from Roland of 2008-09-25:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0039.html 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0043.html 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
URI spec, what changes do we want?
 - Action35 [3] Eric proposal [4]
[3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/soapjms/tracker/actions/35
[4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0046.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Specifying additional JNDI parameters, [5] & [6]
 - Should these JNDI items go into the URI? [7]
 - Do we need to worry about non-String JNDI values? Answer - don't think 
so.

[5] - Email from Derek of 2008-09-22
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0028.html

[6] - Email from Eric of 2008-09-22
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0031.html

[7] - Email from Peter of 2008-09-22
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0026.html


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
JMS headers, do we want to allow for setting arbitrary headers? [8] 

[8] - Email from Peter of 2008-09-25
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008Sep/0041.html


Pubs 

SOAP over Java? Message Service 1.0 
Editor Draft 
   [ 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2008/ws/soapjms/soapjms.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 
]

First Public Working Draft published 
   [ http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-soapjms-20080723/ ]

Next draft: Last Call, milestone plan in Charter says Sept 2008 

Regards, Roland




Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU 












Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Received on Friday, 3 October 2008 11:42:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 18:16:19 GMT