public-script-coord@w3.org from April to June 2015 by author

Adam Klein

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Alex Russell

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 23 June)

Allen Wirfs-Brock

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Thursday, 11 June)

Anne van Kesteren

• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Ashley Gullen

• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Boris Zbarsky

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Callability of <object> (was: Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: [enhancement request] enum partials (Wednesday, 10 June)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Should properties on the named properties object be readonly? (Saturday, 11 April)
• Re: Should properties on the named properties object be readonly? (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Should properties on the named properties object be readonly? (Thursday, 2 April)
• Should properties on the named properties object be readonly? (Thursday, 2 April)

bugzilla@jessica.w3.org

• [Bug 28834] New: Clarify whether and how [EnforceRange] applies to union types (Sunday, 21 June)
• [Bug 27301] Define context variables, such as "context object" (Thursday, 18 June)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Tuesday, 16 June)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Friday, 12 June)
• [Bug 28798] Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Thursday, 11 June)
• [Bug 28798] New: Indicate BufferSource algorithms can throw (Thursday, 11 June)
• [Bug 28797] New: Use IsDetachedBuffer() for BufferSource types consistently (Thursday, 11 June)
• [Bug 28778] New: Should probably perform security checks on arguments too, not just this values (Monday, 8 June)
• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Thursday, 4 June)
• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Thursday, 4 June)
• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Thursday, 4 June)
• [Bug 28244] Requiring @@toStringTag on instances may have performance implications (Thursday, 4 June)
• [Bug 28739] New: Define that different instances of an interface share the [Unforgeable] attributes/operations (Tuesday, 2 June)
• [Bug 28647] New: [WebIDL] error in TreatNullAs example (Friday, 15 May)
• [Bug 28646] New: [WebIDL] conforming *set* of IDL fragments? (Friday, 15 May)
• [Bug 28602] Add additional restrictions for constants? (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [Bug 28602] Add additional restrictions for constants? (Tuesday, 5 May)
• [Bug 28601] Converting an ECMAScript value to a dictionary; use [[GetOwnProperty]] or [[Get]]? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28601] Converting an ECMAScript value to a dictionary; use [[GetOwnProperty]] or [[Get]]? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28601] Converting an ECMAScript value to a dictionary; use [[GetOwnProperty]] or [[Get]]? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28602] New: Add additional restrictions for constants? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28601] Converting an ECMAScript value to a dictionary; use [[GetOwnProperty]] or [[Get]]? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28601] Converting an ECMAScript value to a dictionary; use [[GetOwnProperty]] or [[Get]]? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28601] New: Converting an ECMAScript value to a dictionary; use [[GetOwnProperty]] or [[Get]]? (Monday, 4 May)
• [Bug 28592] Conflicting @@iterator symbols between indexed attributes/getters and maplike/setlike (Friday, 1 May)
• [Bug 28592] Conflicting @@iterator symbols between indexed attributes/getters and maplike/setlike (Friday, 1 May)
• [Bug 28592] Conflicting @@iterator symbols between indexed attributes/getters and maplike/setlike (Friday, 1 May)
• [Bug 28592] New: Conflicting @@iterator symbols between indexed attributes/getters and maplike/setlike (Friday, 1 May)
• [Bug 28583] New: Inherited method name conflicts with consequential maplike/setlike interfaces should fail (Wednesday, 29 April)
• [Bug 27354] Internal slots (Wednesday, 22 April)
• [Bug 22808] Throw if object is constructed without new (Sunday, 19 April)
• [Bug 27354] Internal slots (Saturday, 18 April)
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible (Friday, 17 April)
• [Bug 27988] Get rid of the separate concepts of "setters" and "creators" (Friday, 17 April)
• [Bug 26521] [[GetOwnProperty]] behavior for named properties is not web-compatible (Friday, 17 April)
• [Bug 25025] Named creators with [OverrideBuiltins] don't work right as the spec is written now (Friday, 17 April)
• [Bug 27953] Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional (Friday, 17 April)
• [Bug 27953] Dictionaries with required properties shouldn't need to be optional (Friday, 17 April)
• [Bug 23682] Fix the current [ArrayClass], [] and sequence<T> mess (Wednesday, 15 April)
• [Bug 28477] Warn against boolean arguments defaulting to true (Monday, 13 April)
• [Bug 28477] Warn against boolean arguments defaulting to true (Monday, 13 April)
• [Bug 28477] Warn against boolean arguments defaulting to true (Monday, 13 April)
• [Bug 28477] Warn against boolean arguments defaulting to true (Monday, 13 April)
• [Bug 28477] Warn against boolean arguments defaulting to true (Monday, 13 April)
• [Bug 28477] New: Warn against boolean arguments defaulting to true (Monday, 13 April)

Elliott Sprehn

• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Erik Arvidsson

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 16 June)

Garrett Smith

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 23 June)
• Re: Callability of <object> (was: Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL) (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)

Jeffrey Yasskin

• Re: Advice on how to best handle a long list of attributes (Friday, 15 May)

Jonas Sicking

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 17 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 16 June)
• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Thursday, 11 June)
• Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 10 June)

Joshua Bell

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 10 June)

Mark S. Miller

• Re: Should properties on the named properties object be readonly? (Thursday, 2 April)
• Re: Should properties on the named properties object be readonly? (Thursday, 2 April)

Martin Thomson

• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Mike West

• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Richard Barnes

• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)
• Re: Privileged context features and JavaScript (Friday, 17 April)

Tab Atkins Jr.

• Re: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Wednesday, 10 June)

Tobie Langel

• Re: [enhancement request] enum partials (Wednesday, 10 June)
• [enhancement request] enum partials (Wednesday, 10 June)

Travis Leithead

• RE: Array-with-item in WebIDL (Tuesday, 16 June)

Last message date: Tuesday, 23 June 2015 20:42:46 UTC