W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Simple Straw Poll re. Hash URI Specificity and WebID Definition

From: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:57:16 -0500
Message-ID: <50AD07EC.9040208@w3.org>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
CC: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
I'm told that people are "voting" by just answering the ML, with
non-consistent cross-posting on top of that.

Can we have more chaos, please? I mean, seriously...

W3C has some tools (WBS) to setup polls. Also, this must be proposed
by the chair to have some value.

Alexandre.

On 11/21/2012 11:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> On 11/21/12 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>> "Specifically" is not clear.
>>
>> In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc.
>>
>> So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms.
>>
>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
>> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri
>>
>> in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as
>> described in the current spec.
>>
>> Is this better?
>
> I missed this part in my earlier response. That's fine re. straw poll
> vote (via email or use of Wiki doc), but corrected to read:
>
> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP uri
> [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri .
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:58:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:58:12 GMT