W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Simple Straw Poll re. Hash URI Specificity and WebID Definition

From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 18:04:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKoHFsVf_G8+QGvBfTU07tFMUy334dDx3Pe8R8xtnQDPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>
Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
On 21 November 2012 17:57, Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org> wrote:

> I'm told that people are "voting" by just answering the ML, with
> non-consistent cross-posting on top of that.
>
> Can we have more chaos, please? I mean, seriously...
>
> W3C has some tools (WBS) to setup polls. Also, this must be proposed
> by the chair to have some value.
>

Alex, it's just an (informal) straw poll.  Nothing binding.  Henry can call
a formal vote, if required (I believe).


>
> Alexandre.
>
>
> On 11/21/2012 11:30 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/12 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>>
>>> "Specifically" is not clear.
>>>
>>> In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc.
>>>
>>> So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms.
>>>
>>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
>>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
>>> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri
>>>
>>> in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as
>>> described in the current spec.
>>>
>>> Is this better?
>>>
>>
>> I missed this part in my earlier response. That's fine re. straw poll
>> vote (via email or use of Wiki doc), but corrected to read:
>>
>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
>> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP uri
>> [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri .
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:05:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:05:03 GMT