W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Simple Straw Poll re. Hash URI Specificity and WebID Definition

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:55:48 -0500
Message-ID: <50AD0794.4050907@openlinksw.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
CC: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
On 11/21/12 11:52 AM, Nathan wrote:
> Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
>> [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri .
>
> +1
>
> To be even more specific, I believe the SHOULD is a waste of space, 
> but would like to see the examples for authors use #hash URIs, and non 
> normatively.
>
> For Consumers, in the normative bits: MUST be an HTTP (http(s):// 
> scheme) uri.
>
> We need to be interoperable with both common patterns, but we are also 
> free to offer guidance by way of words or examples.
>
> Best,
>
> Nathan
>
>
>
>

Yes!

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:56:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:56:19 GMT