W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Simple Straw Poll re. Hash URI Specificity and WebID Definition

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:30:31 -0500
Message-ID: <50AD01A7.8040705@openlinksw.com>
To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
CC: "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
On 11/21/12 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote:
> "Specifically" is not clear.
>
> In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc.
>
> So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms.
>
> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
> [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri
>
> in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as described in the current spec.
>
> Is this better?

I missed this part in my earlier response. That's fine re. straw poll 
vote (via email or use of Wiki doc), but corrected to read:

[1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri
[2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
[3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP uri
[4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri .


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:31:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:31:00 GMT