W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Simple Straw Poll re. Hash URI Specificity and WebID Definition

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:52:12 +0000
Message-ID: <50AD06BC.20706@webr3.org>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
CC: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri
> [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri .

+1

To be even more specific, I believe the SHOULD is a waste of space, but 
would like to see the examples for authors use #hash URIs, and non 
normatively.

For Consumers, in the normative bits: MUST be an HTTP (http(s):// 
scheme) uri.

We need to be interoperable with both common patterns, but we are also 
free to offer guidance by way of words or examples.

Best,

Nathan
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:53:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:53:33 GMT