W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > July 2008

at risk features

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:30:56 -0400
To: public-rif-wg@w3.org (RIF WG)
Message-ID: <4968.1215041456@cs.sunysb.edu>

I object to the current formulation of the At Risk notes.
What does it mean "if not sufficiently implemented"?
It is not sufficiently clear to me.
Also, features #1,2,3, in BLD and the ones in DTB have all different
reasons for being marked at risk.

Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2008 23:31:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:51 UTC