W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: at risk features

From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:45:49 -0400
Message-ID: <486D1E5D.70903@gmail.com>
To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

I updated the working a little bit.  I believe this is the formal definition of 
what "at risk" means.


Michael Kifer wrote:
> I object to the current formulation of the At Risk notes.
> What does it mean "if not sufficiently implemented"?
> It is not sufficiently clear to me.
> Also, features #1,2,3, in BLD and the ones in DTB have all different
> reasons for being marked at risk.
> 	--michael  

Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@gmail.com                           Hawthorne, NY 10532
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2008 18:47:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:50 GMT