W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-respimg@w3.org > October 2012

Re: How responsive is responsive?

From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:05:33 +0100
To: public-respimg@w3.org
Cc: Brett Jankord <bjankord@gmail.com>, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Message-ID: <F9B1D52FA19145ACB3288B5429889FD1@marcosc.com>


On Friday, October 5, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Bruce Lawson wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:06:55 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com (mailto:w3c@marcosc.com)> wrote:
>  
> > Following on… The WHATWG Responsive Images proposal currently makes the  
> > "responsive" aspect completely optional:
> >  
> > "The user agent may at any time run the following algorithm to update an  
> > img element's image in order to react to changes in the environment.  
> > (User agents are not required to ever run this algorithm.)"
> >  
> > While what the RICG is proposing is that the responsive algorithm always  
> > runs and always responds to the environment (like CSS Media Queries do).
> >  
> > Is the above correct?
>  
> yes, I think so.
>  


I've asked the HTMLWG to clarify the above. Please see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-comments/2012Oct/0002.html


Relevant RICG bug:
https://github.com/Wilto/draft-prop/issues/58


--  
Marcos Caceres
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 17:06:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 October 2012 17:06:07 GMT