Re: How responsive is responsive? from Bruce Lawson on 2012-10-05 (public-respimg@w3.org from October 2012)

From: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:13:13 +0100
To: public-respimg@w3.org, "Marcos Caceres" <w3c@marcosc.com>
Cc: "Brett Jankord" <bjankord@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <op.wlo2cbn3h8on37@bruce-pc>

On Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:06:55 +0100, Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com> wrote:

> Following on… The WHATWG Responsive Images proposal currently makes the  
> "responsive" aspect completely optional:
>
> "The user agent may at any time run the following algorithm to update an  
> img element's image in order to react to changes in the environment.  
> (User agents are not required to ever run this algorithm.)"
>
> While what the RICG is proposing is that the responsive algorithm always  
> runs and always responds to the environment (like CSS Media Queries do).
>
> Is the above correct?

yes, I think so.

b

Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 07:13:50 UTC