W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:20:58 +0100
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120516102058.7f210634@miranda.g5n.co.uk>
On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:11:12 +0100
Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:

> Coming to the debate a little late perhaps, but this is a really bad
> idea.

Further the current resolution doesn't actually resolve very much. A
"junk triple" is still generated from:

	<div vocab="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" typeof="Person">
	  My name is <span property="name">Toby Inkster</a>
	  and I have a <a href="http://tobyinkster.co.uk/"
	  rel="me">website</a>.
	</div>

If you want to avoid the <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/me> triple, then it
seems to me that the only real solution is to say that @vocab applies to
@typeof, @property and @datatype, but does not affect @rel or @rev at
all. But that's pretty drastic.

-- 
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:19:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:19:20 GMT