W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:14:14 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFoJ=sNRGo4ywivp_p4nzhe6Zn61wBzC2b00NnrFPk9pyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, AlexMilowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 16 May 2012 11:12, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 06:58:03 +0200
> Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:
>
>> actually, under the current resolution, the triple will be
>>
>> [] schema:url <http://www.example.org> .
>
> OK, it is perhaps less bad than I previously thought.

Is RDFa 1.1 still being designed?

Perhaps add both spelings of licen[sc]e to any special case list?

Dan


> But my point regarding [1] still stands.
>
> ____
> 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/
> 2008Sep/thread.html#msg20
>
> --
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
>
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:14:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 May 2012 09:14:50 GMT