W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:45:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFfrAFqYqmckPGCGZtKWtBD_bbFTfP=iYHY69RQvWJoAwAtgyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
On 16 May 2012 11:20, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:11:12 +0100
> Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
>> Coming to the debate a little late perhaps, but this is a really bad
>> idea.
> Further the current resolution doesn't actually resolve very much. A
> "junk triple" is still generated from:
>        <div vocab="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" typeof="Person">
>          My name is <span property="name">Toby Inkster</a>
>          and I have a <a href="http://tobyinkster.co.uk/"
>          rel="me">website</a>.
>        </div>
> If you want to avoid the <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/me> triple, then it
> seems to me that the only real solution is to say that @vocab applies to
> @typeof, @property and @datatype, but does not affect @rel or @rev at
> all. But that's pretty drastic.

If adding a 'me' property to FOAF will help out here, just say the word...

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 12:45:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:56 UTC