W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > May 2012

Re: RDFa Lite and non-RDFa @rel values [Final Take?]

From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 10:06:42 -0400
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
CC: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Alex Milowski <alex@milowski.com>, RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D12C08DF-D4C7-46F7-9CCE-3EA4D4569C75@greggkellogg.net>
It's important to note that the narrow change we adopted for limiting @rel when used with @property in HTML+RDFa broke exactly 0 existing test cases in the test suite. I think this is a good indication of how limited the impact of the solution is.

Gregg Kellogg

Sent from my iPad

On May 16, 2012, at 2:18 AM, "Toby Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, 15 May 2012 22:11:12 +0100
> Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
>> Coming to the debate a little late perhaps, but this is a really bad
>> idea.
> Further the current resolution doesn't actually resolve very much. A
> "junk triple" is still generated from:
>    <div vocab="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" typeof="Person">
>      My name is <span property="name">Toby Inkster</a>
>      and I have a <a href="http://tobyinkster.co.uk/"
>      rel="me">website</a>.
>    </div>
> If you want to avoid the <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/me> triple, then it
> seems to me that the only real solution is to say that @vocab applies to
> @typeof, @property and @datatype, but does not affect @rel or @rev at
> all. But that's pretty drastic.
> -- 
> Toby A Inkster
> <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk>
> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2012 14:07:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:56 UTC