W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Sloppy inference rules

From: David Wood <david@3roundstones.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:17:35 +0100
Message-Id: <F560B23E-EA5D-47A9-8D59-980DBBB0FDDE@3roundstones.com>
Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, Guus Schreiber <guus.schreiber@vu.nl>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:55, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> The idea would be that inference could be done by applying the rules to exhaustion, then throwing away any triple that isn't RDF legal.

Certainly. This is consistent with RDF and is equivalent to recognizing that the extraneous triples are a mathematical artifact of the production.  It is also consistent with my suggestion that JSON-LD state in their spec that there may be valid JSON syntax that is not valid JSON-LD.

There needs to be a "fix" here, but it is an easy one not a major rewrite.

Received on Thursday, 1 November 2012 10:17:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:08 UTC