- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 10:57:45 +0000
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 01/11/12 10:17, David Wood wrote: > On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:55, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: > >> The idea would be that inference could be done by applying the rules to exhaustion, then throwing away any triple that isn't RDF legal. > > Certainly. This is consistent with RDF and is equivalent to recognizing that the extraneous triples are a mathematical artifact of the production. It is also consistent with my suggestion that JSON-LD state in their spec that there may be valid JSON syntax that is not valid JSON-LD. > > There needs to be a "fix" here, but it is an easy one not a major rewrite. > > Regards, > Dave > +1 Or should that be "+i" Andy
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:58:14 UTC