W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > March 2012

Re: simplified section 2.3 Abbreviating common datatypes

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:58:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPqY83zZmmsiufFkn3M733L-xcCZs_Qm-tURkb---+WF3N1JPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:
> The inherited section 2.3 deferred the valid lexical of numerics and
> boolean to the XML Schema Datatypes spec, while the effective
> authority is the grammar. The XSD definition of decimals permit the
> period and fractional part to be omitted.
>  <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#decimal-lexical-representation>
> I summarized the grammar rules and normalized the examples (for
> simpler comparison) and shorted the text a bit. Please compare
>  <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#abbrev>
>  <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#abbrevB>
>  <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/index.html#abbrevC>
> and let me know what you like. (The third factors the examples out
> into a table for easy comparison, Sandro.)

Mmmm, picking. How about a 4th option? I like C, but I'd also like to
see them used in examples. Better examples perhaps then the current
ones. Perhaps just one example document showing all the Abbreviations?


> --
> -ericP
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 20:59:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:13 UTC